Board member fee or salary: how to pay the director of an Estonian company

Almost every week someone asks us the same thing. They have an Estonian company, usually through e-Residency, usually with one person in it, and they want to know whether to pay themselves a salary or a board member fee. The question sounds like a choice between two tax treatments. It is not, and most of the confusion comes from treating it as one. The two payments rest on different relationships, and the tax treatment follows from the relationship, not the other way round.

A board member is not an employee, and the tax follows from that

An employee works under an employment relationship and is paid a wage. A member of the management board is not an employee. The relationship between the company and its director is a different one, and the payment for it is a board member fee. The tax side treats the two as separate payment types and declares them in different places. That is the whole starting point. The fee is not a cheaper wage and the wage is not a fee with extra paperwork. Each has its own rules, and the rules overlap on most rates and part company on one.

For a one-person company the practical effect is that you need to decide, before you pay anything, which of the two relationships you are actually paying for. Getting the label right at the start is far easier than explaining it later.

What is the same in the tax and what is different

Start with what does not change. Income tax is withheld at 22 percent and social tax is 33 percent, on a fee exactly as on a wage. If you have read 2026 guidance showing 24 percent, it is out of date: the planned rise was dropped, and the withholding rate is 22 percent.

The difference is unemployment insurance. A board member fee carries no unemployment insurance premium on either side. The Tax and Customs Board (EMTA) lists management board members among the people who do not pay unemployment insurance premiums at all, so nothing is withheld from the person and nothing is paid by the company. On a wage both exist, at 1.6 percent for the employee and 0.8 percent for the employer.

Three further points complete the picture.

• Funded pension. If the person is a second pillar member, the funded pension contribution is still withheld from the fee, at the rate they have chosen. Dropping unemployment insurance does not drop the pension.
• Declaration. The fee goes into the TSD on Annex 1 as a separate payment type from wages. It is not folded into the wage line. The TSD is due by the 10th of the month after the payment.
• Timing. Estonian payroll taxation is cash based, so what counts is the month in which the fee is paid, not the month it relates to.

The same 2,000 euros as a wage and as a fee

Here is the comparison, limited to what we can state with confidence.

The company saves 16 euros a month. On the person side, 32 euros of premium is not withheld. Across both sides that is 48 euros a month on 2,000 euros, and it is the whole difference we can confirm. We left the person's net pay out of the table on purpose, because income tax is worked out after the other deductions and we would rather show you your own figures than a simplified one. The payroll calculator on this site has a board member fee mode if you want to run them yourself.

Forty-eight euros is never a reason to call a salary a fee

Forty-eight euros a month is 576 euros a year. In a small company that is real money, and it is exactly why the question gets asked. But it is the saving on a payment that has been described correctly. It is not a prize for describing a payment differently. If a person is in truth doing a job and being paid for it, and the company calls the payment a board member fee to avoid two small premiums, the company has taken on a question it cannot comfortably answer in exchange for 576 euros a year.

We do not know the criteria EMTA applies when it looks at a borderline payment, and we are not going to guess them for you. That is one of the open questions further down. What we do know is that the saving is small next to the cost of being wrong. We do not recommend it and we would not set it up that way.

The real decision is what the person actually does

Here is the question that settles it. What does the director do in the company? A person who only holds the position and carries out the management function is acting as a board member, and a fee is the natural payment for that.

A person who also does the work of the business is doing two things. In a one-person e-Residency company that is the usual case: the same person is the director and also the developer, the designer, the consultant, or whoever ships the product. The director role and the working role are separate, and the two can be paid separately: a board member fee for the first and a wage for the second.

Separating them does two things. It matches each payment to what it pays for, which is what makes it defensible. And it lets the wage side follow the ordinary payroll rules, including the 1.338 multiplier, while the fee side follows the fee rules. Where a wage is part of the picture, that half is payroll in the ordinary sense: an entry in the employment register, payslips and the TSD. How much to allocate to each is a judgement about the work actually done. It is yours and your adviser's to make and to write down, and a table cannot answer it for you. Other ways of taking money out of the company are outside this article.

These questions help you see which side a given activity falls on. They are prompts for your own judgement, not tests that we apply on the tax authority's behalf.

• Does the person do work for the company that you would otherwise pay someone else to do, such as development, design, consulting or sales?
• Is that work real and regular, or only occasional?
• Would the director role still exist, with its own responsibilities, even if all that work stopped tomorrow?
• Could you describe each of the two roles in a sentence that a third party would understand?

The questions we settle before the first payment

This is the part most articles skip, and it matters. A handful of points are open in the sense that we do not state them as rules on this page, because we have not confirmed them to the standard we require before a rule goes in front of a client. For a specific company we settle each of them before the first payment. We do not guess.

• Minimum social tax. Whether the monthly minimum social tax obligation applies to a board member fee at all. On a wage the floor is 292.38 euros a month, with a long list of exemptions. Whether the same floor reaches a fee is something we confirm for the case rather than assume.
• Whether anything must be paid. Whether a board member has to be paid anything at all, or can hold the position unpaid. We will not tell you that either answer is the rule.
• Health insurance cover. The exact mechanism by which a board member fee produces health insurance cover for the person. Social tax is paid on a fee, but how that becomes cover, and from when, needs checking before the person relies on it, especially if they have no other cover.
• Re-characterisation. The criteria EMTA uses when it treats a fee as a salary, or the reverse. We know the two are different payment types. We do not know where the line sits in a borderline case and we will not draw one for you.
• Non-resident board members. The detail of how a fee paid to a person living outside Estonia is declared in the TSD annexes. It is a common situation for e-Residency companies, so we check it each time and do not reuse an answer from another file.

None of this is a weakness in the approach. A firm that gives you a confident answer on all five points without looking at your facts is the one to be careful with.

If the director lives in another country

Many directors of Estonian companies live elsewhere, and then two systems are in play. Within the EU a person is covered by social security in one member state at a time, while income tax follows a different rule, the treaty one with its 183 day test. So income tax and social contributions can fall due in different countries for the same person in the same month, and that is the point readers most often get wrong.

What the other country requires on a fee from an Estonian company is a question for an adviser there. We do not file foreign returns and we do not advise on foreign tax or social security. We can tell you what the Estonian side looks like, and our cross-border and board member work is where that is covered.

What we would do for a one-person company

1. Write down what the person does. In plain words, separating the director role from the work done for the business.
2. Decide fee only, wage only, or both, and record the reason in one paragraph.
3. Settle the open questions above for this company and this person, before anything is paid.
4. Set up the declarations. The fee on TSD Annex 1 as its own payment type, and any wage as wages.
5. Pay and file by the 10th of the following month, every month.

If you run the company yourself through e-Residency, this sits naturally inside e-Residency company accounting, where the books and the payroll are handled together. Send us a short description of what the director does and where they live, and we will tell you what we would check first. Our email is timoffei@spatial-eye-finance.com.

Frequently asked questions

Tagsboard member fee or salary Estoniapay yourself from an e-Residency companyboard member fee unemployment insuranceboard member fee employer cost 1.33

Back to all articles